DOWNLOAD: Failure to Yield (2009)
For years the biotechnology industry has trumpeted that it will feed the world, promising that its genetically engineered crops will produce higher yields.
That promise has proven to be empty, according to Failure to Yield, a report by UCS expert Doug Gurian-Sherman released in March 2009. Despite 20 years of research and 13 years of commercialization, genetic engineering has failed to significantly increase U.S. crop yields.
Failure to Yield is the first report to closely evaluate the overall effect genetic engineering has had on crop yields in relation to other agricultural technologies. It reviewed two dozen academic studies of corn and soybeans, the two primary genetically engineered food and feed crops grown in the United States. Based on those studies, the UCS report concluded that genetically engineering herbicide-tolerant soybeans and herbicide-tolerant corn has not increased yields. Insect-resistant corn, meanwhile, has improved yields only marginally. The increase in yields for both crops over the last 13 years, the report found, was largely due to traditional breeding or improvements in agricultural practices.
The UCS report comes at a time when food price spikes and localized shortages worldwide have prompted calls to boost agricultural productivity, or yield -- the amount of a crop produced per unit of land over a specified amount of time. Biotechnology companies maintain that genetic engineering is essential to meeting this goal. Monsanto, for example, is currently running an advertising campaign warning of an exploding world population and claiming that its “advanced seeds… significantly increase crop yields…” The UCS report debunks that claim, concluding that genetic engineering is unlikely to play a significant role in increasing food production in the foreseeable future.
The biotechnology industry has been promising better yields since the mid-1990s, but Failure to Yield documents that the industry has been carrying out gene field trials to increase yields for 20 years without significant results.
As far as we still not aware
As far as we still not aware of the real effects of genetically modified food on human health I would rather not to trust it too much. We have been toxic for decade but we can't stop or control it, because it stimulate the turn of economy.
----
Sincerely,
Andrew, webmaster of free karaoke tracks
As far as we still not aware
As far as we still not aware of the real effects of genetically modified food on human health I would rather not to trust it too much. I know there aren't many alternatives at the moment and that most of our food is chemically treated but in this case I am very well aware of the risks. I know farmers generally use atrazine as herbicide, as long as the food isn't chemically over processed before it reaches us and as long the levels of this substances stay on the safe side I think that would be a better alternative.
could not find your TERMS OF
could not find your TERMS OF USE disclaimer nor a PRIVACY POLICY disclaimer. The Federal Trade commission requires both on commercial sites.
Thanks, Wesley - it's at the
Thanks, Wesley - it's at the bottom of the page, along with my Contact info.
Although I feel compelled to point out how utterly ridiculous it is that such a thing would be required for an inconsequential personal blog site ;)
Post new comment